Support Small and Mid-Size Livestock Producers

Link to share: https://www.westonaprice.org/natl-action-alert-say-no-to-mandatory-electronic-animal-id-by-usda/#gsc.tab=0

On January 18th, 2023, USDA published a proposed rule (Docket No. APHIS-2021-0020), “Use of Electronic Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison.” This would mandate electronic livestock identification to track cattle crossing state lines.

The USDA claims it will help with animal health, but it doesn’t. Mandatory electronic animal identification does not address food safety or animal disease concerns. Current, low-tech methods are working effectively. And it doesn’t do anything at all for food safety, since the tracking ends at the slaughterhouse. Instead, it unreasonably burdens farmers and ranchers, while giving corporate multinational meatpackers yet another market advantage.

Mandatory electronic animal identification is a step in the wrong direction, especially at a time when the negative impacts of corporate consolidation of our food supply are becoming ever clearer, with shortages and skyrocketing prices (while the corporations’ profits also skyrocket).

The real reason for mandatory electronic animal identification is to satisfy monopolistic meatpacker interests to increase their exports markets, their profits, and their control of the U.S. cattle industry.

For decades, multinational meatpacking corporations, high-tech companies, and the USDA have pushed mandatory electronic identification for livestock, particularly cattle. It aims to promote international trade, thus maximizing the meatpacking companies’ profits, while the high-tech companies will make millions selling tags, readers, and all the related infrastructure … all at the expense of farmers and ranchers.

The proposal for electronic ID was defeated in 2010 by massive opposition, from organic farmers, conventional ranchers, livestock sale barns, horse owners, homesteaders, and consumers who want to buy from American producers. But Agribusiness and its allies in the USDA are now trying to bring it back.

The deadline for submitting comments through the Federal Register is Monday, March 20^th at 11:59pm Eastern. Tell USDA to withdraw the proposal.

Mandatory electronic animal ID will harm the economic viability of independent cattle producers and reduce security and resiliency of our food supply.

ACTION TO TAKE

1. Submit your comment to USDA asking them to WITHDRAW the proposed rule on mandatory electronic animal identification. Use the link here for the Federal Register by 11:59pm EDT Monday, March 20^th.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/19/2023-00505/use-of-electronic-identification-eartags-as-official-identification-in-cattle-and-bison#open-comment

2. Spread the word by sharing this Facebook link to a video posted by the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance (FARFA). The shortlink to the comment portal is https://bit.ly/3XYn17l

TALKING POINTS

1. Mandatory electronic livestock identification creates no food safety benefit and will not prevent foodborne illnesses because the tracking ends at the time of slaughter. The vast majority of food safety issues stem from slaughter and processing, not the farm. This proposal takes the safety focus off of where the problems have occurred (the massive processing plants), a diversionary tactic from the real reforms that are needed for food safety, such as improved oversight of slaughterhouses and food processing facilities, and increased inspections of imported foods.

2. Programs such as mandatory electronic animal identification that burden independent livestock farmers and ranchers will hurt efforts to develop safer, decentralized food systems.

3. Mandatory electronic livestock identification unfairly burdens independent family farm livestock producers & taxpayers. It’s not only the costs of the electronic tags themselves, but all the related infrastructure, particularly the readers and software. The rapid changes in technology also mean that readers may need to be replaced frequently, creating endless future costs.

4. Mandatory electronic livestock identification is not a proven effective tool for disease prevention. USDA has been very successful in eradicating diseases through existing, time-proven, low-tech programs. USDA should not be allowed to supplant these successful programs with an unproven system that will consume massive resources in administration and bureaucracy, rather than focusing on the prevention of disease.

5. The proposal favors corporate-controlled operations in which the company owns the animals from birth to death, because they are allowed to use “Group/lot identification,” i.e. simply designating the group of thousands of animals with an ID number instead of electronically tagging each animal. Since independent livestock producers are required to tag each animal, the program creates a huge advantage for vertically integrated, corporate agri-business and meatpackers! This drives consolidation of our food system further, making it difficult, if not impossible, for small and mid-sized livestock producers to survive.

6. Mandatory electronic livestock identification creates privacy concerns and increases corporate control over the livestock industry. Mandatory electronic animal identification could create potential risks for farmers’ private financial information and fuel increased corporate control over the livestock industry by giving packers more information about how animals are produced. This information could potentially be used to discriminate against farmers based on the information available.

OTHER LINKS

Federal Register comment portal –

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/19/2023-00505/use-of-electronic-identification-eartags-as-official-identification-in-cattle-and-bison#open-comment

shortlink to portal – https://bit.ly/3XYn17l

FARFA video – https://fb.watch/jgl1CweHyP/

FARFA webpage –

https://farmandranchfreedom.org/mandatory-electronic-animal-identification/

APHIS proposal plus links to other documents and comments –

https://www.regulations.gov/document/APHIS-2021-0020-0001

This comes to us from the Weston A. Price Foundation:

ACTION ALERT

2-28-22

SUPPORT A GOOD VACCINE BILL IN OREGON!

Here is the link – https://www.westonaprice.org/support-a-good-vaccine-bill-in-oregon/

Oregon’s legislators have introduced a good bill that would prohibit all public bodies and private entities from requiring a person to receive COVID-19 vaccines, possess “vaccine passports, or prove immunity to SARS-CoV-2.”

S.B. 1516 prevents discrimination and also protects minors by requiring that all parents or official guardians give consent before vaccination.

This terrific bill is especially important given the pressure that is mounting to deny access to people who refuse COVID-19 injections. Requiring vaccines and passports for Oregonians to live their lives day-to-day is both an intrusion into people’s private medical information and coercive pressure to be injected with this experimental, high-risk shot.

The introduction of this bill is good news – now we need YOUR voice to help it pass!

Urge your legislators to support S.B. 1516 to help protect minors and people’s freedom to choose what medical procedures they should undergo.

TAKE ACTION

Contact your State Senator and urge him or her SUPPORT S.B. 1516 today!

You can look up who represents you at: https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/senate/pages/senatorsall.aspx (look for the “find your legislator” option in the menu block to the right)

Sample script for email or calls is below. Personalize it by adding your own sentences and changing the wording – personal letters are far more effective than form letters!

“My name is ____ and I live in (town). I am calling to ask Senator ____ to support S.B. 1516, which would prohibit discrimination on the basis of COVID-19 vaccination status by both public entities and businesses in Oregon.

This bill protects individuals’ rights to choose whether or not to be injected with an experimental, fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine.

There have been no long-term studies on the safety of these shots. No person should be forced to be injected with an experimental substance that could cause serious side effects. To date, there have been 760,102 domestic injuries and 10,909 deaths reported in connection with the COVID shots to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) — and it is estimated that only 10 percent of adverse reactions are ever reported.

As recognized by the World Health Organization, vaccine passports create two separate classes of citizens, something that is abhorrent to the principle of equal rights in this country.

People should not be forced to take injections that carry a risk of injury in order to go about their daily lives.

I urge Senator _____to SUPPORT S.B. 1516, which would protect every person’s right to bodily autonomy.

Talking Points:

Keep your call or email short! Pick the 2 or 3 of these talking points – or none of them — that are most important to you and be sure to explain why this issue matters to you personally.

1) Share why this is personal to you. Do you or a family member have a history of vaccine reactions? Are you at risk for autoimmune conditions or other potential side effects of the COVID-19 shot?

2) One of the most basic human rights is that of bodily autonomy, as recognized by the Nuremburg Code. Ethical medicine requires prior, completely voluntary and fully informed consent.

3) No one knows in advance whom a vaccine will harm. Each of us may respond differently as we have different medical histories, genes, epigenetics, and microbiomes.

4) Vaccines are medical procedures that carry risk of serious injury. The U.S. Supreme Court recognizes vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and to cause injury and death in some recipients. The U.S. Government has paid out $4.4 billion to the victims of vaccine injury. Hundreds of thousands have reported an adverse reaction to vaccination to VAERS. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/

5) COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.

6) As of February 11, there have already been 760,102 COVID-19 Vaccine adverse events and 10,909 COVID-19 Vaccine deaths reported in the U.S. to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

MORE INFORMATION

Read the bill at: https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2022R1/Measures/Overview/SB1516