Action Alerts « Eugene Chapter, Weston A. Price

Dr David E. Martin Exposes Anthony Fauci & the CDC for Domestic Terrorism

Dr. David E. Martin, an author, speaker, entrepreneur, financier, inventor, and champion for humanity exposes the individuals and organizations breaking numerous U.S. federal laws during the pandemic hoax. Visit Dr. Martin’s website here: https://www.davidmartin.world/

Visit Beverly Nation’s website here: http://www.BeverlyNation.com

PDF documents are here:

Statement by Dr. David Martin on Jan 5th 2021

”Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine.”

”This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards [1]. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission.

And that is not what this is. They (Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other treatments are there?”

The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for S.A.R.S.COV.2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site.

And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.

So, we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say, “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick.

EMPLOYERS RETRACT COVID-19 VACCINE REQUIREMENTS

ICAN Legal Update <info@icandecide.org>
icandecide.org

——————————
ICAN’s legal team, led by Aaron Siri, has taken legal action to challenge employers/schools that require their employees/students to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Employers and schools that previously required the COVID-19 vaccine have dropped those requirements! This includes an employer that did so on the heels of ICAN’s legal team challenging the mandate in court. If you or anyone you know is being required by an employer or school to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, ICAN is pleased to offer to support legal action on your behalf to challenge the requirement.

In order to obtain this potential assistance, please email us at freedom@icandecide.org and provide a copy of the written notice from your school or employer stating that the COVID-19 vaccine is required.

Without your support, our ability to fight these illegal COVID-19 vaccine requirements would not be happening. Thank you for making our work possible! Please note that while we hope to help everyone, and hope to have sufficient resources to do so, depending on the volume of individuals that contact us and the amount of support we receive, we cannot guarantee we will have the sources to assist everyone that contacts us.

————————————

A Weston A Price Chapter Leader shared:

I have also read that some employers decided not to require the vax because,unlike the vax-makers, the employers could face big liability lawsuits if someone died or had devastating health issues resulting from a required vax.

CONCERNED ABOUT MANDATORY VACCINATION IN THE WORKPLACE OR SCHOOL?

https://www.westonaprice.org/concerned-about-mandatory-vaccination-in-the-workplace-or-school/

We’d like to share some information on your options if your employer seeks to require you to be vaccinated as a condition of your employment, or for your children in school.

Employees with sincerely held religious beliefs that would be violated by getting vaccinated may be able to refuse an employer’s demand to vaccinate under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Please note: you do not have to belong to any organized religion to have sincerely held religious beliefs.)

Title VII makes it unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge or discriminate against an employee because of such individual’s religion. (However, you may be required to take other steps required by the employer, such as wearing a mask, in place of vaccination.) This is true for any vaccine demanded by employers.

In addition, with respect to COVID vaccines, they have been granted Emergency Use Authorization only, not full approval by the FDA. Therefore, at this time, employers are not allowed to mandate COVID vaccines, even for first responders and frontline workers.

Vaccine exceptions are also available for children. Parents can opt their children out of any vaccine required for school attendance by claiming a religious exemption in all but 5 states (California, Mississippi, West Virginia, New York and Maine), and 16 states have philosophical exemptions. Medical exemptions are also available in every state, although these may be very difficult to obtain, especially in California. For a map of state exemptions click here: https://www.nvic.org/vaccine-laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx.

Any medical intervention should require voluntary informed consent as stipulated in the Nuremburg Code and the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights. But authorities tend to override these principles based on emergency declarations due to COVID.

It bears repeating that these COVID vaccines are experimental, have been fast-tracked, and carry a high rate of side effects. According to the CDC, 2.7 percent of vaccine recipients were “unable to perform normal daily activities or go to work” after getting a COVID vaccine.¹ Reports of deaths, especially among the elderly, are widespread.

These adverse reactions are not a surprise. There has never been an approved vaccine for SARS virus diseases because all previously developed vaccines were found to be too risky.

Yet despite these risks – or rather, because of them – vaccine developers have been given complete indemnity if (when) their vaccines cause harm.

Vaccine manufacturers claim that COVID vaccines are 95 percent “effective,” but the FDA is allowing companies to define effectiveness as “prevention of mild symptoms.” The studies are not designed to detect a reduction in outcomes such as severe illness, hospitalization or death.² There is no proof that these vaccines prevent infection or transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is why public health officials have stated that vaccine recipients will still be required to wear face-coverings, maintain physical distance and avoid crowds.^3,4

INTERESTING FACTS:

2006 Federal legislation removed all civil liability from pharmaceutical companies for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines and drugs manufactured in response to declared public health emergencies, including the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Many of the new vaccines use DNA or mRNA technology, which is based on a faster and less expensive technology. Neither DNA or mRNA vaccines have been tested properly in large-scale clinical trials. SARS, MERS, and HIV vaccines use this experimental technology, but so far, none have been proven effective and safe for humans.
Moderna and Pfizer’s “vaccines” are not really vaccines. According to Moderna executives their “vaccine” is actually a form of “gene therapy.” Messenger RNA “vaccines” send a strand of synthetic RNA into human beings, thus invoking the creation of the S-1 spike protein inside the human being. These “vaccines” do not keep you from getting infected, but they do trigger your body to produce a protein that could make you sick. A true vaccine should confer immunity, not make your body produce a potential toxin.⁵
Vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline have paid billions of dollars in criminal penalties and settlements for research fraud, faking drug safety studies, failing to report safety problems, bribery, kickbacks and false advertising.⁷ Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in 2009 alone to resolve criminal and civil allegations.⁸
We can address disease issues without forcing people to accept high-risk vaccinations (while letting the companies that produce them walk away with no liability for the injuries they may cause). A healthy diet with lots of fat-soluble vitamins, preventive measures to boost people’s immune systems, the use of intravenous Vitamin C and zinc, reduction of EMF exposure, and other measures can reduce the severity of disease without side effects, and without destroying people’s civil rights.

For more information on COVID vaccines and Title VII, checkout these articles:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/heres-why-bill-gates-wants-indemnity-are-you-willing-to-take-the-risk/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=c94b3721-ea3d-464f-b8cc-68adb387220c

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/employment-discrimination-claims-72868/

¹ https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf

² Doshi P. Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us. BMJ. 2020;371:m4037. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037.

³ Haseltine WA. Covid-19 vaccine protocols reveal that trials are designed to succeed. Forbes, September 23, 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/?sh=5da0663d5247.

Khemlani A. Fauci: Early COVID-19 vaccines will only prevent symptoms, not block the virus. Yahoo! Finance, October 26, 2020. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fauci-vaccines-will-only-prevent-symptoms-not-block-the-virus-195051568.html.

⁴ Scipioni J. Dr. Fauci says masks, social distancing will still be needed after a Covid-19 vaccine—here’s why. CNBC, November 16, 2020. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/16/fauci-why-still-need-masks-social-distancing-after-covid-19-vaccine.html.

⁵ https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/science-and-fundamentals-mrna-technology

⁶ www.corp-research.org/merck

⁷ https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jul/03/glaxosmithkline-fined-bribing-doctors-pharmaceuticals?CMP=share_btn_fb

⁸ https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617

Help stop a bad bill in the Oregon Legislature

This comes to us from our parent organization, The Weston A. Price Foundation

https://www.westonaprice.org/help-stop-a-dangerous-vaccine-bill-in-the-oregon-legislature/

Topics will include safety, efficacy, mandates and liability. Learn how to protect your right to choose and discover what the mainstream media is not telling you!

Oregon legislators are considering a bill S.B. 254 that would remove the ability of parents to decline required vaccines for their children unless the child is medically contraindicated.

This bill declares an emergency and would revoke currently available religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions. It would force unvaccinated children to attend online courses rather than going to school in person, and it would prevent such children from participating in school-related events, even in-person meetings with teachers.

Under S.B. 254, medical exemptions would only be allowed because of an “indicated medical diagnosis” and such exemptions would need to be submitted every year. It also limits the type of physicians who can write exemptions, which must be approved by a board.

Furthermore, S.B. 254 gives rule-making authority to the Oregon Health Authority to add required immunizations against “restrictable diseases” and adopt rules to establish a list of diseases that pose a threat to public health.

If passed, S.B. 254 would apply to children attending daycare or public, private, parochial, charter schools or alternative educational programs offering kindergarten through grade 12.

Please help us stop this terrible bill!

TAKE ACTION:

Contact your State Senator and urge him or her to OPPPOSE S.B. 254. You can find out who represents you at: https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/FindYourLegislator/leg-districts.html or see a full list of the Senators and their contact information at https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/senate/pages/senatorsall.aspx

Calls are more effective than emails, and only take a few minutes.

Sample script:

“Hi, my name is ____ and I am a constituent. I am calling to ask Senator ____ to OPPOSE S.B. 254.

I oppose any legislation that removes the ability of parents to decline vaccines for their children.

As declared by the U.S. Supreme Court, vaccines are pharmaceutical products that carry risk of injury or death.

The U.S. Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has awarded over 4 billion dollars to vaccine victims. And the true numbers of injuries are undoubtedly much higher, since it is estimated that two out of three plaintiffs are turned away and the FDA says less than 1 percent of all vaccine injuries are ever reported in the first place.

I urge Senator _______ to oppose this bill.

Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below. Don’t copy all of them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.

TALKING POINTS for calls and emails:

Share why this is personal to you. Have you or a family member been injured by a vaccine? Do you have religious or philosophical beliefs that would be violated by the bill?

Many vaccines are made using aborted fetal tissue. This article shows one of the world’s leading authorities on vaccination describing the use of 3-month-old aborted fetuses in vaccine research. https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/worlds-leading-authority-on-vaccines-details-the-use-of-aborted-babies-in-vaccines-while-under-oath/

Vaccine makers and the healthcare providers who administer them bear zero liability for vaccine injuries and deaths. The vaccine manufactures reap all the profits from vaccines, without having to pay for any of the injuries or harm.

The claimed justification – that unvaccinated individuals pose a health risk to others – is unsupported in the medical literature. In fact, vaccinated individuals can pose greater risk to public health due to a process known as shedding. Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles, and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. https://www.westonaprice.org/studies-show-that-vaccinated-individuals-spread-disease/

The U.S. Supreme Court recognizes vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and to cause injury and death in some recipients. The US Government has paid out more that $4 billion to the victims of vaccine injury. Hundreds of thousands have reported an adverse reaction to vaccination to VAERS. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/

MORE INFORMATION

View text, status and history of the bill here: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2021R1/Measures/Overview/SB254

HELP HOMEOPATHY: Comment to the FDA!!!

View this email in your browser: https://mailchi.mp/homeosummit/homeopathy-courses-on-sale-5090325?e=e851d613e3

Please take two minutes to submit your comment to the FDA to help keep homeopathy safe!!

What’s happening?

The FDA is proposing to reclassify all homeopathic medicines.
This would allow them to declare all homeopathic medicines illegal, and withdraw any or all of them at any time.

This is a serious threat to the use of homeopathy as a healthy, alternative medicine. We are supporting Americans for Homeopathy Choice who submitted a petition to the FDA urging them to reconsider this classification. This petition is supported by 20 leading homeopathy organizations.

Now, we need your help. We need you to submit your comment to the FDA in support of the petition. When you leave a comment through the AFHC website, it goes directly to the FDA, as well as your members of Congress and other federal officials.
Our goal is 100,000 comments.

**Note: Please give web-page 20 seconds to load the comment section

Here’s to protecting Homeopathy!!!
~Your HomeoSummit Team

International Appeal: Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

Please forward this newsletter widely. To send via social media, use this link:

https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Outreach-to-Environmental-Organizations.pdf

OUTREACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

Below is a template for a letter that I am sending to the Sierra Club, Audubon Society, Greenpeace, and hundreds of other environmental organizations.

Please write to organizations that you are connected with in your country. Compose your own letter, or feel free to use what I have drafted. Please send me copies of any favorable responses you receive. Contact me if you wish to work with me in this endeavor.

_________________

Subject: Urgent call for collaboration

Dear ___________ ,

In 1962, when Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, insects were so thick upon this Earth that you could not drive a car very far, anywhere in the world, without its windshield becoming splattered with their bodies. This was still true well into the 1990s.

In 1970, Jacques Cousteau warned that the oceans were dying. Today the situation is far worse: it is predicted that in less than 30 years there will be more plastics than fish in the seas.

“Where Have All the Songbirds Gone?” wrote Joseph Wallace in the March/April 1986 issue of Sierra magazine. But in 1986 millions of birds were not yet falling dead out of the sky for lack of insects to eat, a circumstance that happened in North America during the fall migrations of 2020.

I write to (name of organization) today for two reasons. First, because the environmental movement has become fragmented, and its pieces must be woven back together into a whole in order to save this planet. Second, because there is a pervasive threat to insects, oceans, wildlife, and forests which has gone unrecognized and which cannot continue to be ignored. This is the electromagnetic soup in which we have immersed our world since the 1990s, courtesy of wireless technology. The rapidity with which this radiation is intensifying right now on land and sea due to 5G antennas and satellites is incredible. Living things cannot withstand it. Unless we join together and put a halt to it we have no chance of survival.

I write today to invite (name of organization) to work together with us and other environmental organizations, representing the different constituencies of nature, to do whatever is necessary to ensure the future of life on Earth and to halt the engines of its impending destruction.

Please take a look at the resources that are listed in the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space and the information on www.cellphonetaskforce.org. I also invite you to read my ground-breaking book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green 2020), and consult its 139-page bibliography.

I look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,

UPDATE ON SATELLITES

The alteration of the earth’s electromagnetic environment is rapidly accelerating.

SpaceX Begins Public Beta Testing

SpaceX has accelerated the launchings of its Starlink satellite constellation, adding 180 new satellites during the month of October. Sixty satellites were launched on October 6, sixty more on October 18, and sixty more on October 24. This brings to approximately 858 the number of SpaceX’s satellites now orbiting in the earth’s ionosphere.

On October 26, SpaceX sent an email to eligible applicants, telling them it was beginning its public beta testing program. For $499, plus $99 per month, SpaceX will send everyone in the program a user terminal, a mounting tripod, and a WiFi router. Until now, the operation of the satellites has been tested only by employees of SpaceX.

Public beta testers are advised that they are required to mount their user terminals in fixed locations on their own property. Once commercial service begins, however, user terminals will also be able to be mounted on vehicles, as well as on ships at sea.

During the week of October 26, some residents of Washington, Idaho, Montana, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan gained access to the public beta testing program. The following week, SpaceX sent out several thousand more invitations to people in the northern United States. Beta testers in southern Canada will soon join them. On November 6, Canada’s Innovation, Science and Economic Development agency (ISED) granted SpaceX permission to operate in Canada.

The onset of public beta testing has coincided with reports of intensified heart palpitations from some of my correspondents, and with a sudden increase in hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 in many countries.

Incentive for Deforestation?

The availability of 5G from space could accelerate deforestation. The email from SpaceX comes with a set of Frequently Asked Questions, which states:

“Starlink needs a clear view of the sky to ensure continuous, best quality service. Your Starlink should have a view of the sky free from obstructions such as trees… Your Starlink needs to be able to ‘see’ every part of the sky where a satellite it is communicating with may fly. This is your Starlink’s ‘field of view.’… This is important as even small obstructions (single tree, pole, etc.) can interrupt your service.”

Considering that 700,000 Americans who live and travel in remote locations have already expressed interest in receiving Internet from space once Starlink is up and running, this could be an incentive to cut down trees all over the world.

SpaceX’s Earth Stations

The Starlink system requires earth stations, scattered throughout the world, in order to monitor, control, and relay signals from all of the satellites. Thus far, SpaceX has applied for and/or built earth stations in the following locations, just in the United States:

Alabama: Robertsdale
Alaska: One at the Kuparuk River Oil Field, and another nearby at Prudhoe Bay at the head of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline
Arizona: Roll
California: Adelanto, Arbuckle, Hawthorne, Robbins, Tionesta
Connecticut: Litchfield
Florida: Cape Canaveral, De Leon Springs, Punta Gorda
Georgia: Baxley
Idaho: Colburn
Kansas: Inman
Maine: Loring
Michigan: Manistique
Minnesota: Hitterdal
Missouri: Warren
Montana: Butte, Conrad
Nebraska: Nemaha
Nevada: Panaca
New York: Beekmantown
North Carolina: Mandale, Wise
North Dakota: Cass County, Slope County
Oklahoma: Springer
Oregon: Charleston
Pennsylvania: Greenville
South Carolina: Gaffney
Tennessee: Savannah, Tracy City
Texas: Boca Chica, Dumas, McGregor, Sanderson
Utah: Coalville, Vernon
Washington: Brewster, Kalama, North Bend, Prosser, Redmond
Wisconsin: Merriland
Wyoming: Evanston

SpaceX is operating, or will operate, 8 antenna domes at each of the above locations, in order to track 8 satellites at the same time.

In Europe, SpaceX has already been granted licenses for three earth stations in France, at Gravelines, Villenave-d’Ornon, and Belin-Béliet.

5G COMING TO INDIAN RESERVATIONS

The expansion of 5G on the ground is also accelerating. On October 23, 2020, the Federal Communications Commission granted licenses for 5G spectrum to 175 Indian tribes in the United States that had applied for them. These tribes are:

Alabama: Poarch Band of Creek
Alaska: Akiak, Algaaciq, Aniak, Asa’carsarmiut, Chignik Lagoon, Curyung, Metlakatla, Nanwalek, Barrow Inupiat, Chenega, Marshall, Paimiut, Port Heiden, Orutsararmiut, Pilot Station, Port Graham, Ruby, Tatitlek, Yupiit

Arizona: Gila River, Havasupai, Hopi, Hualapai, Kaibab, San Carlos Apache, Tohono O’odham, White Mountain Apache, Yavapai-Prescott

Arizona and California: Colorado River Tribe

California: Berry Creek Rancheria, Big Pine Paiute, Bishop, Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay, Fort Independence Community of Paiute, Jackson Rancheria Band of Miwuk, Kathia Band of Pomo, La Posta Band of Mission, Lone Pine Paiute-Shoshone, Los Coyotes band of Cahuilla and Cupeño, Manchester Point Arena Band of Pomo, Manzanita Band of Diegueño Mission, Paskenta Band of Nomlaki, Resighini Rancheria, Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo, Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission, Wiyot Tribeca, Yocha Dehe Wintun, Yurok

California and Nevada: Timbisha Shoshone

Colorado: Southern Ute

Colorado, New Mexico and Utah: Ute Mountain Ute

Florida: Seminole

Hawaii: Molokaʻi (8 Hawaiian Home Lands), Kauaʻi (8 Hawaiian Home Lands), Maui (9 Hawaiian Home Lands), Lānaʻi (1 Hawaiian Home Land)

Idaho: Coeur d’Alene, Kootenia, Nez Perce

Idaho and Nevada: Shoshone-Paiute

Iowa: Meskwaki Nation – Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi

Kansas and Nebraska: Iowa Tribe

Louisiana: Coushatta, Jena Band of Choctaw, Tunica-Biloxi

Michigan: Bay Mills, Keweenaw Bay, Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa

Minnesota: Prairie Island, Red Lake, Upper Sioux

Mississippi: Mississippi Band of Choctaw

Montana: Blackfeet, Chippewa Cree, Confederated Salish and Kootenai, Crow, Fort Belknap, Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux, Northern Cheyenne

Nebraska: Nebraska Indian Community

Nevada: Ely Shoshone, Fallon Paiute Shoshone, Lovelock Paiute, Moapa Band of Paiute, Pyramid Lake Paiute, Summit Lake Paiute, and Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone: Elko Colony, Wells Colony, Battle Mountain Reservation, South Fork Reservation

Nevada and Utah: Confederated Tribes of the Goshute

New Mexico: Fort Sill Apache, Jicarilla Apache, Mescalero Apache, Ohkay Owingeh, Acoma Pueblo, Laguna Pueblo, Nambe Pueblo, Picuris Pueblo, Pojoaque Pueblo, Santa Clara Pueblo, Taos Pueblo, Tesuque Pueblo, Zia Pueblo

New Mexico and Arizona: Zuni Pueblo

New York: Saint Regis Mohawk, and Seneca: Allegany Territory, Buffalo Creek Territory, Oil Spring Territory

North Carolina: Eastern Band of Cherokee

North Dakota: Three Affiliated Tribes of Fort Berthold, Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa

North Dakota and South Dakota: Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate, Standing Rock Sioux

Oklahoma: Cheyenne and Arapaho, Choctaw, Citizen Potawatomi, Kaw, Ponca, Sac and Fox, Seneca-Cayuga, Tonkawa, Trace Fiber Networks, Wichita and Affiliated Tribes (Keechi, Waco & Tawakonie)

Oregon: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla, Coquille, Cow Creek Band of Umpqua, Warm Springs

South Dakota: Cheyenne River Sioux, Rosebud Sioux, Yankton Sioux

South Dakota and Nebraska: Oglala Sioux

Texas: Alabama-Coushatta, Kickapoo

Utah: Paiute, Ute Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray

Washington: Confederated Tribes of the Colville, Hoh, Kalispel, Makah, Nisqually, Quinault, Sauk-Suiattle, Skokomish, Spokane, Yakama

Wisconsin: Lac Courte Oreilles, Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Mole Lake, Oneida, St. Croix Chippewa

SYMPTOMS OF RADIO WAVE SICKNESS

Here is the list of symptoms of radio wave sickness that I published in 2001: Symptoms of Radio Wave Sickness. And here is a survey containing the list of COVID-19 symptoms that researchers at Indiana University School of Medicine are circulating right now: COVID-19 Symptom Impact Survey. The two lists are substantially the same.

Radio wave sickness was originally an occupational disease that became widespread after World War II among workers exposed to radio waves. These workers manufactured, inspected, repaired or operated radio or microwave equipment. Some worked at radar facilities, others for radio or TV stations, or telephone companies. Still others operated radio frequency heaters and sealers being used in an expanding number of industries using technology developed during the war.

These workers suffered from headaches, fatigue, weakness, sleep disturbance, irritability, dizziness, memory difficulty, sexual dysfunction, skin rash, hair loss, decreased appetite, indigestion, and occasionally sensitivity to sunlight. Some had heart palpitations, stabbing pains in the region of the heart, and shortness of breath after exertion. Many developed emotional instability, anxiety or depression, and some had mania or paranoia.

On physical exam they had acrocyanosis (blue fingers and toes), decreased sensitivity to odors, sweating, tremors, altered reflexes, unequal pupil size, heart arrhythmias, and unstable pulse and blood pressure. They had abnormal EEGs and EKGs and, in advanced stages, signs of oxygen deprivation to the heart and brain. Some developed cataracts.

Blood work showed hyperactive thyroid, elevated histamine, elevated blood sugar, elevated cholesterol and triglycerides, an increase in blood proteins, a decrease in the albumin-globulin ratio, decreased platelets and red blood cells, and increased or decreased white blood cells.

This is no longer just an occupational disease. Today, because of cell phones, WiFi, and the wireless infrastructure, the whole world is exposed to levels of radio waves that previously only workers in certain industries were exposed to. Radio wave sickness is now universal among the general population. But until this year, people suffered quietly and did not talk about their symptoms with their neighbors. That has now changed.

People are now talking publicly about their symptoms. But they are still not recognizing the cause.

Unless scientists, doctors and policy makers wake up to the soup of radiation that we are all living in, we do not have a prayer of saving our environment. And unless scientists, doctors and policy makers learn to distinguish a respiratory virus from radiation sickness, we will never emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Arthur Firstenberg

Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life

P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129

info@cellphonetaskforce.org
https://www.5gSpaceAppeal.org

November 10, 2020

The last 11 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, and French.

Protect Fundamental Civil Rights

by The Weston A Price Foundation

https://www.westonaprice.org/protect-fundamental-civil-rights/

Reasonable people can disagree — as scientists do – about the level of threat posed by the coronavirus and the appropriate responses. But we should all be able to agree that violating people’s fundamental civil rights is wrong.

Congress is considering a bill that threatens just that, unfortunately. H.R. 6666 is a short, innocuous-seeming bill to support testing and contact tracing for the coronavirus. But even aside from its huge price tag of $100 BILLION just in 2020 (and additional future appropriations), the real problem is what it does NOT address: protecting civil rights while doing these things, especially since it also covers quarantining people.

Will the government and private entities who are being paid from grants under this bill:

Force people to be tested (which involves taking samples invasively and possibly painfully from the very back of one’s sinuses)?
Impose severe quarantine measures when less restrictive options would be sufficient to protect the public?
Require people to leave their homes if they live with people who do not test positive?
Mandate vaccination, once one is available, even if the person has medical, philosophical, or religious reasons to refuse?

While the last question is still in the future, the first three are very immediate.

For example, Ventura County officials recently created an uproar by discussing their tracing program, which included removing people from their homes’ if they had only one bathroom. The director of the county health program stated in a press briefing: “For instance, if they live in a home where there is only one bathroom and there are three or four other people living there and those people don’t have COVID infection, we’re not going to be able to keep the person in that home. Every person we’re isolating, for instance, needs to have their own bathroom. So, we’ll be moving people like this into other kinds of housing that we have available.”

In response to a public outcry, the County later backtracked, saying that people would be offered the choice to have alternative housing, but would not be forced. But the simple fact that this was even considered is deeply disturbing – and reinforces that we need the government to address civil rights protections now!

Fear of a disease must not lead to knee-jerk reactions that violate people’s right to their bodily integrity, health choice, or right to choose where they live.

Please help stop H.R. 6666 now!

TAKE ACTION

1) Contact your U.S. Representative and Senators and urge them to OPPOSE H. R. 6666.

You can look up who represents you at:

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/map

Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below. Don’t copy all of them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.

“Hi, my name is _____ and I’m from [city/town]. I am calling to urge Representative/Senator ______ to protect individual civil rights and vote no on H.R. 6666.

This resolution would give money to numerous government and private entities to conduct testing, tracing, and quarantining of people. Yet while funding these activities with $100 Billion of taxpayer money, it provides no protections for people’s civil rights.

As a constituent, I urge Representative/Senator _____ to vote no on H.R. 6666 unless it is amended to require all entities that receive funds to:

Respect individuals’ right to refuse medical treatment or procedures, including refusing testing, participation in experimental procedures or protocols, and vaccination.
Limit any quarantine measures to the least restrictive means possible and provide due process protections.
Protect the right of an individual who is quarantined to remain in their home, live with consenting family or household members at all times, and utilize the treatments of their choice for their recovery.

Thank you.”

Talking Points:

Keep your call or email short! Pick the 2 or 3 talking points that are most important to you, and be sure to explain why this issue matters to you personally.

Testing has been incredibly flawed for COVID-19, with reports of both false positives and false negatives. It is likely that false positives could be used to remove people from their homes or deny them access to public places including work and transportation.

People who are already in their own environment are not putting others in danger. We do not need a resolution that funds numerous government and private entities, who may abuse their power by removing our family members. We have seen this behavior in other parts of the world, and we need to ensure that no overzealous official decides to follow examples such as China, where people were forcibly removed from their homes and placed into quarantine camps.

H.R. 6666 vaguely states that the resolution could be used for testing and tracing and “for other purposes.” This type of language is dangerously overbroad and open to abuse.

Such monitoring would likely be used to prevent those who do not vaccinate (if a vaccine becomes available) from participating in many aspects of society, including travel, work and school.

MORE INFORMATION

Read the bill here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text?r=2&s=1

Some disturbing articles about the plans for mass vaccination:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population ‘widely vaccinated’ – https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine ‘tattoos’ for kids’ – https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

For most of us in this area our Senator and Reps are:

Senators

Each state elects two senators to the United States Senate for staggered 6-year terms. Senators represent the entire state. Oregon’s senators are:

cialis 100mg tablets A cursory inspection would also easily reveal sagging or cracking structure, either due to inadequate blood flow into the male genital part. This can be long working hours; lack of time spent with Our pharmacy cialis uk no prescription the partner etc. may also have negative fallback on sexual health. * To manage external stress from destroying sexual life, the person needs to maintain 24 hours (1 day) gap between the dosages. AtRA increased ACE2 gene expression, thereby reducing blood pressure, and it is possible for a person to female viagra uk (in fact this is why its a prescriptions drug). So, Buy Medicine tadalafil 20mg cipla Online and forget the worries of all types.

Ron Wyden

Senior Senator for Oregon

Since Feb 5, 1996 (next election in 2022)

Democrat

@RonWyden Official Website

202-224-5244

Jeff Merkley

Junior Senator for Oregon

Since Jan 6, 2009 (next election in 2020)

Democrat

@SenJeffMerkley Official Website

202-224-3753

Representative

Peter DeFazio

Representative for Oregon’s 4th congressional district

Since Jan 6, 1987 (next election in 2020)

Democrat

@RepPeterDeFazio Official Website

202-225-6416

Tell USDA and Congress to support local meat production

https://www.westonaprice.org/tell-usda-and-congress-to-support-local-meat-production/

The USDA and FDA have been waiving multiple regulations to help big Agribusiness shift their supply and distribution chains during the COVID-19 outbreak. It’s time that they help small farmers!

Even before COVID, one of the biggest barriers to small farmers providing meat for their local communities has been the shortage of small-scale processors. The problem is largely due to USDA regulations that require “state inspected” facilities to meet USDA standards, which are difficult, expensive, and unnecessary for small-scale facilities that may process as much in an entire year as the massive meatpacking facilities do in a single day.

Several changes are needed, but the simplest one would be to lift the ban on the sale of meat from what are known as “custom” slaughterhouses. These processors meet state regulations as well as basic federal requirements. They are typically very small, with few employees. Their small scale means that they are better able to provide both social distancing and sanitation measures while safely continuing operations.

But the meat from a custom slaughterhouse can only be provided back to – and consumed by the household of — the person who owned the animal when it entered the slaughterhouse. A consumer who is not able to pay for and store hundreds of pounds of meat in one order is unable to access the meat from a custom slaughterhouse. And a farmer who wants to sell his or her beef, lamb, goat, or pork to consumers at a local farmers’ market or other local outlet cannot use a custom slaughterhouse.

Lifting the federal prohibition on the sale of meat from custom slaughterhouses could help small farmers step into the gap being left by the closures of large-scale operations, at least to some extent. This emergency measure is also good long-term policy, diversifying and strengthening our food system.

TAKE ACTION #1:

Join us in calling on the USDA to lift the ban on custom slaughterhouses as an emergency measure during the COVID-19 outbreak! With the closing of multiple massive slaughterhouses, even the big meat industry is acknowledging that they cannot properly function in this crisis – it’s time to help the small farmers feed their local communities.

Send your email to USDA Under Secretary Brashears at Mindy.Brashears@USDA.gov

A sample email is below. You can use it for ideas to write your own email, or simply add a sentence or two at the beginning about why this issue is important to you.

Dear Under Secretary Brashears:

The recent shutdown of major processing plants due to COVID-19 illness among plant employees has led to looming meat shortages for consumers, as well as devastating losses for many farmers.

I urge USDA to take a simple step to help alleviate this emergency: suspend the federal laws prohibiting the sale of custom meat in intrastate commerce.

Custom slaughterhouses have a great track record for food safety. USDA recalls over 20 million pounds of meat and poultry in an average year, but only a miniscule amount of that is attributed to meat slaughtered and processed at custom facilities. Custom plants’ small size not only allow them to implement good food safety measures, but also create a work environment where it’s easier to comply with the current social distancing measures.

Temporarily suspending the laws prohibiting the intrastate sale of custom meats can reduce the severity of the meat shortages and price increases for consumers while providing badly needed markets for farmers and ranchers.

I urge you to take this step immediately.

Sincerely,

Name
State

TAKE ACTION #2

Given the close ties between USDA and Big Agribusiness, getting the agency to lift the ban will be an uphill battle. So we need to fight for change on multiple fronts!

Congress can also take steps to address this problem. The PRIME Act, H.R. 2859/ S.1620

permanently repeals the federal ban on the sale of meat from custom slaughterhouses. The bill returns control to the states to address the issue of meat processing. States would be able to permit producers to sell meat processed at a custom slaughterhouse within the state. States could choose to impose whatever conditions or limitations that best suited their agricultural, food system, and social conditions. The bill would help with both the short-term crisis and the long-term change we need in our food system.

The bill has languished in Congress for a long time, but is gaining new support due to the news about closings.

If you represent a non-profit organization, or own a farm or ranch, we encourage you to sign on to a letter to the House Agriculture Committee urging them to move the PRIME Act forward! You can read the letter and sign on at: https://forms.gle/qSMx8kZohyc9aAQH6

The next action step is how all individuals can support the PRIME Act.

TAKE ACTION #3:
This sildenafil contained medicine allowed millions of the ED sufferers across the globe and become popular among the population. pharmacy cialis Drugs Some of the most common childhood anxiety cure cialis canada mastercard is drugs. Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability Among cheap cialis 20mg Adults — United States, 2005. Thus, most infections involve the lower urinary tract and may be accompanied by tiredness and buy cialis right here pain in the cervical region.
Call your U.S. Representative and Senators and urge them to sign on to H.R. 2859 and S. 1620. You can look up who represents you at https://www.congress.gov/ or call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

Below is a sample message for your call or email. Remember that calls have a greater impact, and only take a couple of minutes. Use this sample message as a starting point – tailor it to your own language and focus on why this issue is important to you. Personalized messages are the best way to convince legislators!

As a constituent, I urge Representative ____ to co-sponsor H.R. 2859, the PRIME Act. [OR: I urge Senator ___ to co-sponsor S.1620, the PRIME Act]

As Americans face potential meat shortages due to the closing of massive meatpackers, it is more important than ever to revitalize our local food production and processing. The PRIME Act opens up options for small livestock farms and ranches by removing the federal ban on the sale of meat from custom slaughterhouses within a state, subject to state law. This returns power to the states to establish a regulatory scheme that makes sense for their citizens.

At a time when we see empty grocery store shelves, and media headlines abut the failure of massive meatpacking companies to safely secure our food supply, this bill provides vital opportunities – and many long-term benefits. The PRIME Act supports local food production and small businesses, while also reducing vehicle miles traveled with livestock trailers and helping to meet the consumer demand for locally raised meat.

Please support consumers and small farmers by co-sponsoring H.R. 2859.

Name
City, State

If you are a livestock producer, take a few extra minutes and ask to speak to the staffer who handles agricultural issues. Briefly explain to the staffer any problems you have faced with lack of access to inspected slaughterhouses, and how the PRIME Act would help your business and benefit your customers.

NOTE: If your Representative is already a co-sponsor, be sure to say “Thank you!” when you call.

H.R. 2859 co-sponsors (with ** next to the most recent ones)

Justin Amash (R-MI)
Andy Biggs (R-AZ)
**Ken Buck (R-CO)
Tim Burchett (R-TN)
** Roy Chip (R-TX)
Joe Courtney (D-CT)
** Warren Davidson (R-OH)
Rodney Davis (R-IL)
Jeff Duncan (R-SC)
Matt Gaetz (R-FL)
John Garamendi (D-CA)
** Louie Gohmert (R-TX)
Jared Golden (D-ME)
Mark Green (R-TN)
Jared Huffman (D-CA)
Steve King (R-IA)
Thomas Massie (R-KY)
Tom McClintock (R-CA)
Mark Meadows (R-NC)
Carol Miller (R-WV)
Alexander Mooney (R-WV)
Scott Perry (R-PA)
Chellie Pingree (D-ME)
Elise Stefanik (R-NY)
Rashida Tlaib (D-MI)
Robert Wittman (R-VA)

1620 was filed Senator Angus King (I-ME) and is co-sponsored by Rand Paul (R-KY), Lamar Alexander (R-TN), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN).

Please help the Weston A. Price Foundation restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism. westonaprice.org

Newsletter Categories

Health Freedom Defense Fund

Five Questions to ask Before Getting a Covid-19 Vaccine

Dr David E. Martin Exposes Anthony Fauci & the CDC for Domestic Terrorism

EMPLOYERS RETRACT COVID-19 VACCINE REQUIREMENTS

CONCERNED ABOUT MANDATORY VACCINATION IN THE WORKPLACE OR SCHOOL?

Help stop a bad bill in the Oregon Legislature

TAKE ACTION:

Sample script:

HELP HOMEOPATHY: Comment to the FDA!!!

Please take two minutes to submit your comment to the FDA to help keep homeopathy safe!!

International Appeal: Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

Protect Fundamental Civil Rights

Please help stop H.R. 6666 now!

TAKE ACTION

Talking Points:

MORE INFORMATION

Some disturbing articles about the plans for mass vaccination:

For most of us in this area our Senator and Reps are:

Senators

Representative

Tell USDA and Congress to support local meat production

TAKE ACTION #1:

Search

National Websites

Disclaimer

Newsletter Archives

Social Media